1. In "Intertexts", Ede and Lunsford have a fairly clear theme behind the quotations used there. Regardless, the authors neglected to make their own comments on the text and therefore their intentions with the work remain unclear. Do you think this is acceptable, or that an explanation is necessary?
2. How do you feel about the possibility of completely doing away with the concept of "author" due to a philosophical understanding of knowledge and creativity being attributable to no one person?
3. As a writing teacher, would you focus on the importance of the writer or the reader in relation to text? Explain the faults in the view that opposes yours.
No comments:
Post a Comment