1. Since "immediacy" has the same root word as "hypermediacy", what can we then say about the way we commonly use the word "immediate"? It seems an interesting question, consideringwhat it has come to mean, possibly in spite of its origin.

2. Is it necessarily true that an advancement in media would bring attention to itself in the way Bolter writes about it?

3. Bolter points out that computer graphics experts try to make their 3d models "photorealistic". What are some other instances where one media has attempted to emulate another?